Divorce financial settlement: Is everything really split 50/50?
Updated: Sep 14
If you're separating or getting divorced, you may have heard that the finances will simply be divided 50/50.
It sounds straightforward.
But divorce finances are rarely that simple.
There is no automatic rule that everything must be split equally. Instead, the law requires the circumstances of each family to be considered when deciding what a fair financial settlement might look like.
Sometimes that may mean an equal division.
Sometimes it won't.
So, how are finances divided in a divorce?
Is a divorce financial settlement always 50/50?
No.
One of the most important cases in this area is White v White, decided by the House of Lords in 2000.
The case is often described as establishing the idea of a 50/50 divorce settlement. That's not quite right.
White v White established that equality is an important yardstick when considering fairness, and that there should be no discrimination between the different contributions made within a marriage.
In other words, the person who earns the money isn't automatically entitled to more simply because they earned it.
Looking after the home and caring for children are also contributions to the family.
But White v White did not create a rule that every divorce should result in a 50/50 financial settlement.
So if you're asking:
“Will we have to split everything 50/50?”
The answer is:
Not necessarily.
What does the law consider when dividing finances?
The starting point is the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
When considering a financial settlement after divorce, the court looks at the individual circumstances of the family.
This can include:
each person's income and earning capacity
property and other financial resources
financial needs and responsibilities
the standard of living during the marriage
the age of each person
the length of the marriage
any disability
contributions made by each person
the needs of any children
and, in limited circumstances, conduct.
Where there are children under 18, their welfare is the court's first consideration.
There isn't a calculator that can simply take the value of your house, savings and pensions and tell you what percentage each person should receive.
It's often about needs, not percentages
For many families, the most important question isn't:
Who gets 50%?
It's:
What does each person need to move forward?
The Family Justice Council's guidance explains that needs are the measure by which the vast majority of financial remedy cases are decided.
Those needs can include housing, income and capital, as well as pensions and other financial resources.
This is particularly important where resources are limited.
Imagine a couple with two children who separate.
One parent may remain living with the children and need suitable accommodation for them. The other parent will also need somewhere to live.
Dividing the available money exactly 50/50 might sound fair.
But what if doing so means neither household can afford suitable housing?
The court isn't simply looking at whether the numbers are equal.
It's looking at the needs of the family and the resources available to meet them.
The Family Justice Council has produced a useful guide to sorting out finances on divorce, which explains how the courts approach financial needs and the different factors that can be taken into account.
What happens to the family home?
For many separating couples, the family home is their biggest asset.
It's also often the most emotionally difficult part of a financial settlement.
There may be a number of possible options, including:
selling the property and dividing the proceeds
one person buying out the other's share
transferring the property to one person
postponing the sale
or, in appropriate circumstances, allowing one person and the children to remain in the property for a period of time.
A Mesher order can sometimes be used to postpone the sale of a family home.
But keeping the family home isn't automatically the right answer.
The mortgage, affordability and future housing needs of both people need to be considered.
The question isn't simply:
Who gets the house?
It is:
What housing arrangement is realistic and fair for both households?
What happens to pensions in a divorce?
Pensions are another important part of a financial settlement that can easily be overlooked.
It can be tempting to think:
My pension is in my name, so it's mine.
But pensions can form an important part of the overall financial picture following divorce.
Depending on the circumstances, pensions can be dealt with in different ways, including pension sharing, pension attachment or offsetting pension rights against other assets.
For example, one person might retain more of the equity in the family home while the other receives a greater share of the pension provision.
A pension also isn't simply the same as having cash in the bank, which is one reason why pensions can require careful consideration.
Does it matter who earned the money?
Yes, contributions can be relevant.
But earning the majority of the household income doesn't automatically mean that person should receive the majority of the assets.
This is another important principle from White v White.
A marriage may involve one person earning the income while the other looks after the home and children.
Both roles can represent valuable contributions to the family.
The law should not favour the person who earned the money over the person who supported the family in other ways.
That doesn't mean that every contribution will be valued in exactly the same way.
It means that financial and non-financial contributions both need to be recognised.
What about an inheritance or assets owned before the marriage?
This can be more complicated.
A person may have brought assets into the marriage, inherited money or property, or built up a business before or during the relationship.
The source of an asset can be relevant when considering a financial settlement.
But that doesn't necessarily mean the asset is automatically excluded.
The circumstances matter, including the length of the marriage and whether the family's needs can be met without using those assets.
In a needs-based case, the court may have to look at all of the available resources to ensure that both parties' needs can be met.
This is one of the areas where getting independent legal advice about your individual circumstances can be particularly important.
What are “needs, sharing and compensation”?
You may also come across three principles when reading about financial settlements after divorce:
Needs
Making sure the financial needs of both people, and any children, are properly considered.
Sharing
Recognising that assets built up during a marriage can represent the fruits of the marital partnership.
Compensation
In appropriate circumstances, recognising a significant economic disadvantage one person may have experienced because of the way the marriage was organised.
These principles developed through later case law, particularly Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane.
They aren't a simple formula for calculating a divorce settlement. They are principles that help explain how fairness is approached.
For most families, however, needs are likely to be the most important consideration.
Where children are involved, their needs can have a significant impact on decisions about housing, income and day-to-day arrangements. You can also read more about making arrangements for your children after separation.
What about spousal maintenance?
A financial settlement isn't necessarily just about dividing assets.
One person may also need ongoing financial support from the other. This is known as spousal maintenance.
There isn't a fixed formula for deciding how much should be paid.
Income, expenditure, financial needs, earning capacity and affordability can all be relevant.
Where possible, the aim may be to move towards financial independence and a clean break.
But that isn't possible in every family.
For example, childcare responsibilities, age, health or a significant difference in earning capacity may mean that ongoing financial support needs to be considered.
So what does a fair financial settlement look like?
Unfortunately, there isn't one answer.
A fair settlement for one family may look very different from a fair settlement for another.
Consider two couples with exactly the same amount of money and property.
One might have no children, two similar incomes and substantial pensions.
The other might have young children, one main income, a mortgage and a significant difference in pension provision.
It wouldn't necessarily make sense for the two families to reach exactly the same financial outcome.
This is why a divorce financial settlement isn't simply about dividing up the assets and calculating a percentage.
It's about looking at the circumstances of the family as a whole.
Do you have to go to court to sort out your finances?
No.
There are different ways of reaching a financial settlement following divorce. You might negotiate through solicitors, use collaborative practice, arbitration or mediation rather than going to court.
Mediation provides a structured opportunity for both people to discuss their financial circumstances and explore possible options together.
That might include:
the family home
mortgages and other debts
savings and investments
pensions
income and expenditure
future housing needs
children's needs
maintenance
businesses or other assets
and whether a clean break is possible.
The Family Justice Council's own guidance is designed to help separating couples understand the financial issues and reach fair agreements where possible, without necessarily having to go to court.
There are different ways of reaching a financial settlement following divorce. Choosing how you deal with the process can also have a significant impact on the time, cost and emotional strain involved. You can read more about the potential time and cost of mediation in our guide.
You can find more information about the options for getting a financial agreement after divorce on GOV.UK.
Mediation isn't about deciding who gets what
Financial discussions after separation can be difficult.
There may be strong feelings about the family home, money, pensions or the different contributions each person has made.
It's understandable to start with:
I want half.
Or:
I earned it, so it's mine.
But those statements don't necessarily answer the bigger questions.
What does each person need?
What resources are available?
What happens to the children?
What housing is affordable?
What happens to pensions?
Can both people become financially independent?
What would allow both people to move forward?
These can be much more useful questions to explore.
Mediation isn't about telling you what you should agree.
It's about creating a structured space where you can understand the issues, explore the options and work towards an agreement that you both understand.
You can also obtain independent legal advice alongside mediation, so that you can understand your legal position before making decisions.
So, is divorce really 50/50?
Sometimes it might be. But there is no automatic 50/50 rule.
The law requires the circumstances of each family to be considered.
White v White established equality as an important yardstick when considering fairness, but it did not establish that every divorce financial settlement must be divided equally.
For many families, particularly where resources are limited, needs will be central to the outcome.
So rather than asking:
How much do I get?
it can sometimes be more helpful to ask:
What do we both need to move forward?
That change in question can make a difficult conversation much more constructive.
If you're separating and worried about your finances
You don't need to have all the answers before you start the conversation.
Mediation can give you a structured opportunity to look at the financial issues together, explore the available options and work towards an agreement.
It's not about splitting everything down the middle.
It's about working out what could work for your family.
If you'd like to find out more about how mediation could help you and your former partner have those conversations, you can contact New Moon Mediation to arrange an initial conversation.
This article provides general information about financial arrangements on divorce and is not legal advice. Financial outcomes depend on the individual circumstances of each family. You should consider obtaining independent legal advice about your own situation.
Comments