When siblings disagree about an elderly parent’s care: Could mediation help?
Updated: Sep 3
How family mediation can help when adult siblings disagree about elderly parent care, finances and what is best for an elderly parent.
When an elderly or seriously ill parent begins to need more care, families can suddenly find themselves having conversations they never expected to have. With the result being siblings disagreeing about elderly parent care.
Where should Mum live?
Should Dad stay at home, or would a care home be better?
Which care home should we choose?
How will it be paid for?
Who is going to organise everything?
And perhaps the most difficult question of all:
What would Mum or Dad actually want?
For adult siblings, these decisions can become surprisingly difficult.
Even families who have always been close can find themselves disagreeing, becoming frustrated with one another or falling back into old patterns of behaviour.
Sometimes the disagreement isn't really about the care home at all.
It is about fairness, responsibility, money, guilt, memories and years of family history.
When siblings see things differently
Imagine two adult siblings.
One lives nearby and has been visiting their parent several times a week. They have been taking them to appointments, doing their shopping and helping around the house.
The other lives further away. They have a demanding job and young children, but they contribute financially and visit whenever they can.
When their parent’s health deteriorates, the sibling who lives nearby thinks a care home is now necessary.
The other disagrees.
They believe their parent could remain at home with additional support.
Both believe they are acting in their parent’s best interests.
Both may genuinely believe the other sibling doesn't understand the situation.
And that's where conflict can begin.
“But I know what Mum would have wanted.”
This is one of the most difficult parts of these conversations.
Adult children may have very different memories of conversations they had with their parent.
One might say:
“Mum always said she would never go into a care home.”
Another might say:
“Yes, but she also said she wouldn't want us to struggle to look after her.”
Neither person is necessarily being dishonest.
They may simply be remembering different conversations, or interpreting the same conversation differently.
When emotions are high, “What would Mum want?” can quickly become “You don't understand Mum like I do.”
And once that happens, the discussion can become much more personal.
Then there is the question of money
Care can be expensive.
Families may need to discuss savings, income, property and how care will be funded.
Sometimes one sibling believes the family home should be sold.
Another feels strongly that their parent's home should be protected.
One may believe that everyone should contribute equally.
Another may feel that their years of providing unpaid care should be recognised.
And sometimes inheritance is sitting quietly in the background of all of these conversations.
Nobody may want to say it out loud.
But it can still influence how people feel about spending their parent's money.
This is why an argument about care fees isn't always really an argument about care fees.
Sometimes it is an argument about what each sibling believes is fair.
“I've done everything.”
Another common source of resentment is the different ways siblings contribute.
One person might provide most of the hands-on care.
Another might contribute financially.
Another might organise appointments, deal with professionals or manage paperwork.
Someone else might live hundreds of miles away but still make regular visits.
There can be a tendency to measure these contributions against one another:
“I've done this.”
“Well, I've done that.”
“You don't know how much I've had to deal with.”
The problem is that there isn't always an easy way to compare them.
And when people feel their contribution is being overlooked, resentment can build very quickly.
What happens when siblings stop talking?
Sometimes the disagreement becomes bigger than the original decision.
Messages become shorter.
Phone calls stop.
Other family members become involved.
Partners are drawn into the disagreement.
Old grievances resurface.
A sibling might say:
“This is just like when we were children.”
And suddenly the conversation isn't just about Mum's care anymore.
It's about everything that has happened between the siblings over the years.
This can make finding a way forward even harder.
Could mediation help?
Mediation can provide a structured and neutral space for family members to have difficult conversations.
It isn't about deciding which sibling is right.
It isn't about telling the family what care home they should choose.
And the mediator doesn't make the decision for them.
Instead, mediation can help family members explore:
What does the parent need now?
What do they believe their parent would want?
What are the practical options?
What are the financial considerations?
Who is able to do what?
How can responsibilities be shared?
How can different contributions be recognised?
What feels fair to everyone?
What needs to happen next?
Sometimes simply having the opportunity to explain why something matters can change the conversation.
A sibling who appears to be refusing a care home may actually be frightened about losing their parent.
A sibling pushing for a care home may be exhausted and worried that something will happen if more support isn't provided.
A disagreement about money may actually be about feeling that one person's contribution has never been recognised.
Understanding this doesn't necessarily mean everyone will agree.
But it can make agreement more possible.
Mediation isn't about making everyone agree
This is important.
Families don't always leave mediation agreeing on everything.
They may still have different opinions.
The aim is not to manufacture agreement where none exists.
The aim is to help people have a better conversation and, where possible, find practical decisions that everyone can live with.
Sometimes that means agreeing what happens next.
Sometimes it means agreeing who will do what.
Sometimes it means identifying information that the family needs before making a decision.
And sometimes it simply means helping family members communicate without the conversation becoming another argument.
Starting the conversation before it becomes a crisis
If your family is beginning to struggle with decisions about an elderly or seriously ill parent, it may be worth having the conversation sooner rather than later.
You don't necessarily need to wait until relationships have completely broken down.
In fact, mediation can sometimes be most useful before the conflict becomes entrenched.
The earlier family members can talk openly about care, responsibilities, money and what their parent might want, the more opportunity there may be to work together rather than against one another.
A different kind of family dispute
Sometimes the people sitting opposite one another aren't former partners.
They're brothers and sisters.
They may have spent their entire lives as a family.
And now they're trying to make difficult decisions about someone they all love.
Sometimes families don't need someone to decide who's right.
They need somewhere to have the conversation.
If you and your siblings are struggling to agree about the care, finances or future arrangements for an elderly or seriously ill parent, mediation may be worth considering.
New Moon Mediation offers a calm, structured space to help families have difficult conversations and explore a way forward.
To book an initial chat with me, please get in touch. For further reading please visit ageuk,
Comments